US MAGAZINE HAVE A CREEPY PERVERT PHOTOGRAPHER??? LEAVE THIS FAMILY ALONE I HOPE THEY GET SUED FOR THIS??????
DISGUSTING MAGAZINE???????

it isn’t about being 1/2 naked. it is about a little girl wearing a boy’s swimsuit and without a top at the age of 4 where children are in school. i am disappointed in pitt! they are trying to make their daughter a political statement! sick! at 3 she was carrying 2 baby dolls around. she had a trauma to her tooth and then is seems like something else happen and now we have a girl trying to be a boy! the mother called her a blob and then goofy – not like most mothers would have said creative or wonderful imagination. goofy is a put down! jolie doesn’t seem to have affection for her maybe it was because she had to have her to get pitt! i feel so sorry for shiloh. i wish they would let her stay with her grandmother pitt for 6 months! then we would have a happy little girl again. i am not against tomboy! only wish for a person with wisdom in the child’s life that loves her for her!

Seriously?

What she’s showing is, at this point, no different from a boy not wearing a shirt. Get a freaking clue.

She’s four. Four! She doesn’t have breasts! In France, the little girls wear only bottoms until they are 9 or 10. Because they don’t have breasts and there is nothing to look at.

But in France, there is no way that a photographer could publish a picture of a four year old girl taken without her parents’ permission.

Americans are very strange about being naked. But you don’t mind guns, violence, invasion of privacy? Bizarre.

i remember as a child wearing just shorts and no t shirt.. but as soon as i turned 4 my mom told me that girls were shirts to cover our privates… at 4 and always wanting to wear boys clothing makes me wonder if she is going to be gender confused

Here in Switzerland girls very often wear only shorts or a bikini panty until they want cover up themselves – I don’t see the problem.

I hope they get sued for obviously being on private property and publishing a photo of a little girl trying to have fun with her sister. These kids are being raised ‘internationally’ and as you can see from comments of those who are from the US, this is no big deal. US weekly is garbage.

Sorry Roberta, your information is wrong. This photo was taken at a hotel swimming pool, and paps have come forward with explainations that this can NOT be a long range shoot. It was shot within feet of Shiloh. Normally, and in a different time, this wouldn’t have been a problem, but I shudder at the thought of this child’s photo being traded all over the internet by perv’s and then downloaded to get their jollies off with. I don’t want that for my daughter. This photo is now in a Pedophile’s database. This child is too exposed…doesn’t anyone remember what happened to Jon Benet? We’re supposed to protect our children, not put them in harm’s way. It is now being speculated that this photo was ordered, and then paid for by a prestigious photo gallery. Something is very wrong, and this is very sick. I’m afraid you’re going to find out some things about this that you’re not going to be happy about. These are sick parents, with an even more sick “mother,” all played out for the benefit of publicity.

Hate to say the Euros are right, but there should be an enforceable law against taking pictures of celeb kids (especially when not with their celeb parents) in the U.S. This borders on pedophilia IMO. I know they just want to make a point that the kid is transgender (because Jolie is jealous of her beauty, or Pitt believes in same sex marriage, or some such nonsense). My thoughts, she looks like a really happy kid enjoying her 4th summer.

Shiloh is so cuteee, shes only four its a phase, I think people are over reacting, and princess Zee’s hair is getting long pretty girl.

what’s is your problem with a 4-year old girl wearing a boys short and no top??? my god, you americans are such a pervs! relax!

I am dumbfounded by the notion that anyone thinks a 4 year old cannot swim without an unnecessary bra or top. Those who persist in sexualizing this child at this young age by insisting she must cover up her “sex” are sick. Yes it is the people who are even bringing this idea up that are the true perverts and whackos.
This really all just seems like an exercise in attacking the mother – which sadly many women with issues are prone to do.
They would do better to mind their own business and get some counseling.

And for those worried about pedophiles – they collect pictures of children no matter what the child is wearing.

CJ with really nasty comments like this “These are sick parents, with an even more sick “mother,”” you are posting on the wrong forum. Try femalefirst for all the extreme Angelina/Brad haters with their vile, nasty and offensive comments. Nutters the lot of them.

People let 4 yr olds run naked on the beach in Santa Monica all the time. Who cares. 4 year olds don’t have breasts. Get over it. Even the fact that a girls breasts are looked on as sexual shows our ridiculousness as a culture. That, and the fact that we are terrified by anyone who doesn’t fit a standard. Good for Brad and Angie. Even if she feels like she was born in the wrong body as she gets older, maybe she’ll bring attention to how some people honestly feel. For now though, she’s 4. Let her be a toddler, please.

Poor Shiloh. Angelina and Brad have a lot to answer for. Shiloh is being played as a little boy, she is obviously confused next to her darkie sister.

Well MB, sorry that rattles your cage but what would you think of a mother that ordered this photograph shot by a professional studio? Didn’t you notice the clarity? This was a publicity shot. Period. AJ put this child in a boy’s outfit for a covershoot when she was 3 weeks old. Shiloh is NOT, NOT picking out her clothing. This is all contrived by the whacked out Jolie who thinks it’s CUTE while it keeps their names on the front page. Get a brain and stop being so gullible.

Alexandra – I dare you to post naked pictures of your little girls on the internet so the pervs can pleasure themselves with them. I dare you. Idiot.

Terrible. She’s too old to be wearing no shirt and boys trunks. Most people are now putting swim shirts on their boys. I don’t care what other countries do, this little girl is from the U.S. culture. It’s more than wrong and it’s part of a bigger picture of everything her obvioulsy disturbed mother is doing to her. The other little girl has on a girls swimming suit. Why does’t the mom dress her in boys clothes and trunks and remove her shirt as well?

No one in the U.S. lets little girls go without a shirt after age 3, no one. And everyone in the U.S. knows this and follows this culture norm.

The mom wants attention, and using the little girl to get it. No loving mother would do such a thing to their child.

I mean honestly, she’s just a little kid. If she likes boys clothes, what’s the big deal? She likes boys swimming trunks, she isn’t 16 years old, she’s four. Lighten up. If I hadn’t known this was Shiloh, I would have figured it was a boy anyway. I don’t think her parents are ‘disturbed’ if they let her go out of the norm and wear boy things. If they weren’t celebrities there wouldn’t be some big ‘scandal’ with this.