« Britney Spears for Candies - Photos | Home | Come And Knock On My Door… »
Debbie Rowe Has Spent Time With Michael Jackson’s Children - Photos
By Roberta | July 6, 2009
Of course, Katherine Jackson would like us all to believe that Debbie Rowe had no kind of relationship with her two children by Michael. But that’s just not true, and we have the photos to prove it.
These photos might actually have a play in any upcoming custody battle between Debbie Rowe and Katherine Jackson. Debbie was photographed with him and the children at his request, to make sure that the children would always know who their mother was.
These photos would prove to a court that Debbie had actually spent time with her children and wasn’t just a mere surrogate with no bond to them.
Following the death of Michael Jackson, Debbie reportedly said, “They are my flesh and blood. I’m going after my children!”
All of this amidst reports that she had never even visited the kids. And even Diana Ross wants to have a play in the custody arrangements, per Michael’s will, should anything happen to Katherine.
Diana had reportedly said, “I promised Michael I’d never allow that woman - we didn’t mention her name - to get his babies. Michael was terrified she’d end up with their children should anything happen to him. He begged me not to let her get them. That was his worst nightmare.”
She added, “We discussed him putting me as the children’s guardian in his will but I didn’t know he’d actually gone through with it. I was shocked he’d made it official. It’s a huge responsibility but I’ll keep my word if I have to. That woman doesn’t deserve them. With Michael passing I’ve lost my best friend, we were loyal to one another and I don’t know what I’ll do without him. But he told me caring for the children would be his dying wish so of course I’m going to respect that.”
Who should get the kids?
Topics: Michael Jackson, Wired Gossip |
BREAKING Wired News...
Lindsay Lohan Calls Her Dad a Loser
----------
Mariah Carey Tells Larry King She Was Emotionally Abused
----------
Kristen Stewart Says 'F Off' to Dating Questions
----------
The Most Shocking Celebrity Sex Scandals
----------
Comment Policy: By posting a comment, you affirm that you are 13 years of age or older. No hate speech or curse words allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Allie is Wired reserves the right to delete comments by anyone who doesn't follow the rules. Thanks for reading!
22 Responses to “Debbie Rowe Has Spent Time With Michael Jackson’s Children - Photos”
Comments
July 6th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
you have the photos to prove it??? how many years ago was these taken?
when you print some of debbie with her children that were taken in the last year then yeah, i might actually believe that maybe just maybe she had some sort of relationship with them and that they are not complete strangers to eachother.
July 6th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
Since the photographer spent the same amount of time with the kids as Debbie, maybe he should get it on the custody battle too.
She sold her kids and she’d do it again most likely.
July 6th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
You could be right, I don’t claim to know everything. These were taken a while back, considering his kids are huge now. But Katherine did say that they shared NO relationship, which seems to be 100% untrue. Perhaps she only had a relatively small percentage of a relationship with her kids, but they are still her kids. And just because a dead man wrote down on a piece of paper that the kids should stay with his mother, doesn’t make it so. If I were her, I would definitely be fighting for my children and I would’ve started that a long time ago.
July 6th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
I won’t be surprised if at some point Debbie Rowe gets accused of wanting the kids for Jackson’s money BUT she could have gone after that before now. UNLESS there are legal documents where she relinquished any and all parental custody of her children, I think she should be granted custody of her children. I think at this point it would benefit all concerned for the children to act like responsible adults and exercise cooperation so that the children can be a part of all their lives.
July 7th, 2009 at 11:37 am
I am sorry, but I know in the state of Texas if the parent who has custody of the children then the other parent will obtain custody reguardless of the will of the dead parent. It will have to go thru a huge court trial to prove that the living parent is not able to take care of the children. By this, that means mentally unstable, prostitute, or drug and/or alcohol addicticted. And even then depending on if she gets help or has had help and has been released with a clean bill of health, she still may still recieve custody. That is her children, and just because people don’t agree with who they are, at one time they did in this case because she was in the family. Those people need to deal with their personal problems and allow the children to be raised by their actual parents as the laws are outlined to do.
July 7th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
[...] I believe Debbie Rowe needs to leave her children with the Jackson [...]
July 7th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Debbie did give up all rights to her children and then a few years ago, fought to have them partially restored. But as the only living parent, she’s very likely to get them, even if she hasn’t been apart of their lives.
What might be important in the courts eyes is that the three children remain together and might benefit Jackson’s Will in keeping his wishes, although now Debbie is saying she’ll take all three children to keep them together.
July 7th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
The children should be allowed some choice in where and with whom their lives are to be spent. As far as the mother that sold her children long ago; she has no ties to the third child. All of the children should be allowed to stay together with their grandmother, and not enter into some strange world with a woman they don’t truly know, the abscent mother. Stability, consistency and unconditional love of family you are close too (which was made obvious today at the Memorial for Michael) are what one needs at such a time. The children will go on to do great things with the support of a loving family–not from the ‘where they’ll know they had a mama’ photo woman.
July 7th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
These are OLD photos….and they look like publicity photos. The children are old enough to decide who they want to live with. After seeing today’s memorial, I would give an educated guess that they want to live with their grandmother. I’m sorry…but Debbie gave up the rights to those children….something as a mother I would have never done…not to mention they will be separated from Blanket if Debbie is granted guardianship of the older two. I thought Paris was unbelievably amazing and that her father would have been so proud of her. I can’t believe some think it was staged! It came from the heart and this is a little girl who misses her daddy.
July 7th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
HAS LATOYA OR JANET ASKED FOR CUSTODY OR ANY OF THE BROTHERS,MAYBE SOME ONE LIKE THEM SHOULD GET CUSTODY AS THEY ARE YOUNGER.
I LOVE YOU MICHAEL NO MATTER WHAT PEOPLE SAID ABOUT YOU.I ALSO WANT TO KNOW IF MICHAEL ACTUALY BEING ACCUSED OF BEING A PEDOPHILE THEN IN ALL THE YEARS HE BEEN A STAR WHY IS IT THERE WAS ONLY 2 ACCUSATIONS,I DO NOT BELEIVE HE DID ANYTHING TO THOSE BOYS.
July 7th, 2009 at 7:37 pm
These pics look so staged, so fake, so long ago. It is so obvious MJ did not want this woman a part of his children’s lives or she would’ve been in the will.
Pls Pls Pls pray this woman remains only an egg donor. The kids belong with family. The Jackson family.
July 8th, 2009 at 11:45 am
She is the biological mother of the children (2 of them) and nothing more. That is what Michael wanted anyway otherwise he would keep the mother close to the children. She accepted to stay off the custody of the children since they were born. Why she returns now? The children grew up with so much love and care and this is soooooo obvious. I am truly hurt to see such wonderful children left without their father and being bombarded by the media. Please PLEASE be human. Leave these children alone. PLEASEEEE
The children should grow up with uncles and unties - THE JACKSON FAMILY! Thats where they belong and thats CLEAR!
Nothing against debbie Rowe but if she wants the best for the children she should let them live with the Jacksons. It may be hard for her but its the best for the children!
July 8th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
FOUR photos - three of which were obviously taken on the same day! And the fourth taken around the same period of time. GOT ANY PHOTOS TAKEN WITHIN THE LAST 10 YEARS? If not, you got nada…
July 8th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
First and foremost my Heart and Prayers goes out to the “Jackson Family”, this has been a terrible lost to the whole entire WORLD!! But for those who feels Debbie Rowe should get custody is so CRAZY!!! I truly feel she doesn’t deserve custody of those 2 children cause if she truly wanted them she would have been tried to get them LONG LONG TIME AGO, she c’s BIG $$$$$$$$$ signs thats why she wants them. They look so HAPPY all 3 of those kids r so use to being 2gether and thats how they should stay, if she wants visitation to see them every month that would be good or every 2 weeks at least she be apart of there lives. But I feel she doesnt even deserve that. But thats my opinion all we can give is our opinions but the children she get to say who they want to live with because its there lives everyone is deciding on.
July 9th, 2009 at 9:02 am
I think that Michael jackson should stay were they are at right now, they are very happy with the Jackson’s family. I agree Shatron, all 3 kids looks so happy and they should stay together they shouldn’t be separated at all. Debbie Rowe don’t deserve those kids, and its up to the kids not her because she was never a mother to them Michael Jackson has been a mother and a father at the same time and thats a hard thing to do raising 3 childrens all by yourself. Michael did a great jobe raising his kids the right way like a parent should be doing and Debbie Rowe ain’t one. If I was the judge I would give full custody to Michael Jackson mother.
July 9th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Sorry I meant to say that Michael Jackson 3 Kids should stay where they are at right now.
July 9th, 2009 at 9:06 am
I meant to say I think that Michael Jackson kids should stay right were that are at right now.
July 10th, 2009 at 9:23 pm
Are you freaking kidding me? This pics were obviously taken before she sold her rights to these kids for sweet Michael’s 8.5 million dollars which was only the first time she took money for her kids I might add. Then the second time she supposedly wanted them she did the same thing again. Now reports show she and her mother are broke so if she goes after the kids it will be for another payoff.
July 13th, 2009 at 1:30 am
Is the baby Paris? These must of been taken at least 10 years ago, and if she sold them she honestly doesn’t seem to want them. So why should she have them now? I think they should stay with the Jackson family for sure.
July 17th, 2009 at 3:16 am
I cant stop crying over the king of pops death.so debbie u little rat bag how long ago were these photos taken yeah thats right when u were still living with michael i cant stand her she makes me sick she doesent care that these childrens father is dead and that they are like the only people that they have ever known.
debbie u make me sick
God bless u Michael in my heart u r a true legend let the angels watch over u and ur children
July 21st, 2009 at 8:48 am
Debbie Rowe has had years to come forward to raise her children. There has been nothing but 1 call (an interview in which she says those are Michael’s kids)and no shows. He is dead now. She had to know that there was a chance he could die for whatever reason while her children was young. Most parents wonder about that when they bring a life into this world. If she “really” did it for Michael she should honor his wishes! If she did it for herself she should continue what she has done in the past.(keep herself aligned to Michael’s money) She is no different than the prescribed Joe Jackson. What a hypocrit she is if she does not want her children around him. She as well has made her living off of her children. Law in California should be changed and named after Michael Jackson. His children are one thing he got right. Children should remain with the intact family of the departed, or as stated in the departed’s will in a situation such as this. Especially if the mom has been a deadbeat, and she has NOT been a part of the children’s life. The first picture appears to be shortly after birth, she still has a stomach, and the baby is not that old. These pictures were while they were still married, shortly after Paris was born.
July 22nd, 2009 at 1:06 pm
I heard Debbie Rowe refer to taking all 3 of the kids saying “I wouldn’t want to break up the set”, like they were some sort of litter or dinnerware place setting. If she had any sort of motherly instinct she would never refer to children in that way. She breeds horses and dogs, and I dare say she’d probably relate to the kids only as animals, like her dogs. As long as Joe Jackson stays out of the picture, the kids are probably better off with Grandma and Aunties and Uncles. There should be some sort of provision by the court saying the Jackson family can only have them if they don’t turn them into the “Jackson Three” and put them on tour. The kids can decide their own career goals when they reach the age of consent.