« Fergie & Josh Duhamel’s Wedding Photos | Home | Britney Spears in ‘Sex and the City’ Sequel »
No Twilight Sequel For Vanessa Hudgens
By Roberta | January 14, 2009
Vanessa Hudgens reportedly auditioned for the role of Leah Clearwater in the “Twilight” sequel, “New Moon“.
Ashley Greene said that Vanessa would make a perfect Leah in the sequel, but not so fast, she didn’t get the part. And maybe, just maybe, her PR machine is working overtime to make it look like she didn’t audition at all. Because, you know, if you don’t audition, you can’t be turned down.
When asked about the small part of Leah Clearwater in New Moon” screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg said, “If Vanessa is auditioning for the role of Leah, she’s written her own pages to read, ’cause I didn’t write ‘em.”
The fact of the matter is, Vanessa Hudgens did not get the part, and while there is speculation as to whether or not she auditioned, that fact still remains.
What do you think? Think it was a good play for them to leave Vanessa out of the movie?
On a side note, but in Twilight-related news, Hello! Magazine is having a “Most Attractive Man” poll and our favorite vampire Robert Pattinson is leading the way with 85,471 votes.
Topics: Robert Pattinson, Vanessa Hudgens, Wired Gossip, Wired Movies |
BREAKING Wired News...
Brangelina Suing Tabloid Over Split Reports
----------
Casting 'The Real Celebrity Housewives of Hollywood'
----------
Angelina Jolie Is Heading to Haiti
----------
Letterman Sends Biff Henderson to Hospital
----------
Comment Policy: By posting a comment, you affirm that you are 13 years of age or older. No hate speech or curse words allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Allie is Wired reserves the right to delete comments by anyone who doesn't follow the rules. Thanks for reading!
9 Responses to “No Twilight Sequel For Vanessa Hudgens”
Comments
January 15th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
[...] No Twilight sequel for Vanessa Hudgens AllieIsWired [...]
January 15th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Vanessa Hudgens would be all wrong for any character in the movie!!!!!
January 16th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Vanessa would’va been great in the film but of course they didn’t let her be part of it or she wouldva outshined all those ugly chicks in it.
January 16th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
if v got that part omg i would be so made she would ruin the whole movie and the 3rd and 4th .thank god she didnt. not that i dont like her but shes all wrong for the part
February 1st, 2009 at 1:50 pm
why oh why whoever said she is pretty is wrong she looks like a fish ready to drink you
dont tell me she thought she would get a chance she is a wrong part but yannoo they want to act mad let the idiots hire the bratt WHY CANTE SHE DIE.
February 3rd, 2009 at 2:59 pm
look , vanessa hudgens is a very, how can i say it,a very clean person that dont want to have a little stain in her cloth and skin, and if you already read the books, leah is a person that sometimes dont took a shower, or dont use another cloth,so vanessa isnt the right person to interpret leah clearwater
February 5th, 2009 at 8:41 am
I am so glad that she dodnt get the part And all the twilight lovers that i know are glad too!!
February 17th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
i think she would be ok but she would need a total different personality!
March 4th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
ok,my friends and i were discussing this at school and we all agreed,NO DISNEY! is it true that the sprouse twins and brenda song were being trying to get into new moon, too? cuz that ain’t gonna happen. and the jonas brothers would just make a song for the movie for a) money b) girls/popularity. they probably think that by being twiguys they r gonna be hotter.